Interests

Over 100 million Samsung customers have Android 12 available on their devices. And while even more devices continue to get closer to receiving the latest Android OS and One UI versions, Google is working on Android 13 in the background. We will talk about the list of Android 13 compatible Samsung devices. The first Android 13 Developer Preview build was released in February, though it wasn’t made available for any Samsung phones or tablets. Nevertheless, we can assume that future, public versions of Android 13 will be accompanied by a new version of One UI — possibly called One UI 5.0. Samsung’s firmware update policies give us a pretty good understanding of which Galaxy smartphones and tablets are eligible for the upcoming Android 13 / One UI 5 update. Check out the lists below and feel free to let us know in the comment section if your device is present. List of Android 13 compatible Samsung devices Galaxy S series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy S22 Ultra Galaxy S22+ Galaxy S22 Galaxy S21 FE Galaxy S21 Ultra (LTE/5G) Galaxy S21+ (LTE/5G) Galaxy S21 (LTE/5G) Galaxy S20 Ultra (LTE/5G) Galaxy S20+ (LTE/5G) Galaxy S20 (LTE/5G) Galaxy S20 FE (LTE/5G) Galaxy S10 Lite Galaxy Note series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy Note 20 Ultra (LTE/5G) Galaxy Note 20 (LTE/5G) Galaxy Note 10 Lite Galaxy Z series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy Z Fold 2 5G Galaxy Z Flip Galaxy Z Flip 5G Galaxy Z Fold 3 Galaxy Z Flip 3 Galaxy A series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy A73 Galaxy A53 Galaxy A33 Galaxy A71 5G Galaxy A71 Galaxy A51 5G Galaxy A51 Galaxy A52 Galaxy A52 5G Galaxy A52s Galaxy A72 Galaxy A Quantum Galaxy Quantum 2 Galaxy A42 5G Galaxy A03s Galaxy A12 / A12 Nacho Galaxy A32 Galaxy A32 5G Galaxy A22 Galaxy A22 5G Galaxy A23 Galaxy A13 Galaxy A03 Galaxy M series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy M42 5G Galaxy M12 Galaxy M62 Galaxy M01 Galaxy M22 Galaxy M31 Galaxy M32 Galaxy M32 5G Galaxy M52 5G Galaxy M33 Galaxy M23 Galaxy F series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy F42 5G Galaxy F62 Galaxy F12 Galaxy F22 Galaxy F23 Galaxy Xcover series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy Xcover 5 Galaxy Tab series Android 13 compatible devices Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Galaxy Tab S8+ Galaxy Tab S8 Galaxy Tab S7+ (LTE/5G) Galaxy Tab S7 (LTE/5G) Galaxy Tab S7 FE Galaxy Tab S6 5G Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Galaxy Tab A8 10.5 (2021)

Hackers have posted reliable screeshots to back reports of an Okta security breach. Okta provides single sign-on user authentication tools in the enterprise sector, with a huge range of blue-chip clients. Its tools are available for Mac and iOS, as well as Windows and Android. An Okta compromise is a big help to business customers as it provides single sign-on access to both devices and services, so it can potentially allow attackers very substantial access to cause an okta security breach to your data. Okta is a secure identity cloud that links all your apps, logins and devices into a unified digital fabric. With Okta, you’re up and running on day one, with every app and program you use to work, instantly available. Whether you’re at your desktop or on the go, Okta seamlessly connects you to everything you need. Reuters reports. Authentication services provider Okta Inc is investigating a report of an okta security breach, the company said on Tuesday, after hackers posted screenshots showing what they claimed was its internal company environment. An okta security breach could have major consequences because thousands of other companies rely on the San Francisco-based firm to manage access to their own networks and applications. Independent security experts say that that the evidence provided is solid. “I definitely do believe it is credible,” said independent security researcher Bill Demirkapi, citing pictures of what appeared to be Okta’s internal tickets and its in-house chat on the Slack messaging app. Dan Tentler, the founder of cybersecurity consultancy Phobos Group, said he too believed the breach was real and urged Okta customers to be “very vigilant right now.” Okta itself confirmed a security breach, which it said was the result of a support engineer’s account being compromised. It says this occurred in January and it was ‘contained.’ However, it is quite alarming that the company did not notify customers at the time, and no details are yet available on the exact or amount of data accessed.

PHP and Node.js are the two major backend technologies that power web applications. Choosing between NodeJs and PHP is a very important decision for your backend projects. PHP is the older between them, so it has a larger community. The PHP community has begun seeing a lack of relevant and updated projects. This is where Node.js is most successful. In building a strong user base across projects meant for modern-day use cases. Although both technologies were introduced at different times, They are quite similar for a number of reasons– for instance, both are considered useful for the backend of web applications, are open source, and have a large community. Choosing between Nodejs and PHP for your backend can confuse some developer\’s because of their similarities. However, businesses with previous PHP projects tend to choose it over Nodejs. While Node.js is a favorite among developers tackling modern-day problems with its fast-growing libraries and frameworks. Given their various differences, choosing between Nodejs and PHP can affect various things like time-to-market, resource utilization, product performance, budget, and much more. Node.Js Vs PHP – Whether to Choose PHP or Nodejs PHP is among the most reliable server-side scripting languages. It is used by some of the tech giants like Facebook, Wikipedia, and Tumblr. It has been around since 1995. With a very large supporting community around it. Choosing between Nodes and PHP can be quite a daunting task for new developers. Although it’s execution is synchronous, it has several built-in functions and libraries that make building e-commerce and CMS websites super easy.  Launched in 2009, Node.js has quickly established its dominance in key web-application projects. Used by LinkedIn, Netflix, Medium, and other big players, its popular asynchronous architecture gives it the efficiency and speed crucial for the handling of requests. Choosing Nodejs over PHP can be wise considering the speed. But then, PHP has been around for sometime, so choosing php over Nodejs can make it easier to access a larger community. While PHP is a scripting language and Node.js is a runtime environment, both are widely used as backend technologies for web-app development. Choosing between node.js and PHP can be quite a challenge. With the help of libraries, frameworks, and APIs, both Node.js and PHP prove ideal for a number of projects.  POPULARITY Metric PHP Node.js 1. Number of Websites 7,400,000 129,000 2. Market Share (Across Websites Segmented by Traffic) 5/5 0/5 3. Lead in Geography 162/162 0/162 4. Stack Overflow Questions 1,290,000 281,000 5. Popularity Across Website Categories 6/6 0/6 Although the data clearly shows PHP’s staggering popularity across all the categories, it doesn’t account for the 14-year gap between the launches of the two. It also doesn’t show that PHP has struggled with new-age projects lately. We have to take that into consideration when choosing between them. This has made choosing between Nodejs and PHP quite diffiult because Issues with scaling and concurrency are primary reasons why it’s failing to keep up with today’s tech demands and is experiencing a downward trend surprising no one. When choosing between Nodes and PHP, this factor should be considered. Node.js, on the other hand, offers more relevant packages for modern projects – easily out-performing PHP in this regard and gaining a devoted user base while at it.  Click to view more of our posts

We will discuss on How to switch off Defender antivirus on windows but first what is defender. Microsoft Defender Antivirus, formerly known as Windows Defender, according to wikipedia is an antivirus protection program that\’s included with Windows. Unlike other antivirus programs like McAfee, Microsoft Defender is free and doesn\’t require any additional installation. It\’s also routinely updated from Windows Update. Inspite of that you can turn Microsoft defender on or off from the Windows settings. However, there are other quick strategies for turning it on or switching off Windows Defender Windows 10 or even Windows 8/8.1. It\’s best to pick the best system according to the variation of Windows you are using. A general idea when it comes to security is that you should ceaselessly have security enabled for your PC reliably. This could be using Windows Defender, Microsoft’s own security plan fused into Windows 10, or using a pariah security instrument. There are certain situations where you ought to hinder antivirus and firewall protection in Windows. For example, when you are playing a game yet the antivirus keeps on looking at the scratches and tones down the system. Another model can be the place where the antivirus recognizes a program as a false sure in spite of the way that you understand that the program is completely safeguarded to use. Which is why we need to know how to switch off defender antivirus. Certain people acknowledge that it is safeguarded to turn off Windows Defender and use breaking programming. This joins instituting Windows using unlawful instruments like KMSPico or the Microsoft Toolkit. These breaking gadgets are erratic in any way shape or form. They could inject malware into the system that may not be discernable by the antivirus after foundation. There are two strategies for turning off Windows Defender, either for a short time frame or for eternity. We will look at the two changed ways here. The best technique to switch off Defender antivirus Using Windows Settings To turn Windows Defender on or off using Windows Settings, follow the means under: Open Windows Settings (Windows key + I) Go to Update and Security then window security From the right-hand sheet, select Manage settings under Virus and risk protection settings. Flip the change to Off under Real-time protection. There you have one of the best ways to switch off defender antivirus on your Windows system. This should be done only when absolutely necessary because switching off Microsoft defender can leave system very vulnerable to attack.

The massive growth of double extortion – and even triple extortion – ransomware attacks is at risk of rendering common, traditional methods of reducing the impact of ransomware hit, such as well-maintained backups, less efficacious, according to a report from machine identity specialist Venafi. Data collated from Venafi’s worldwide survey of IT and security decision-makers revealed that 83% of successful ransomware attacks now involve alternative extortion methods – an example is leaking data to the dark web (35%), using stolen data to extort customers (38%), and informing customers that their data has been compromised (32%). A mere 17% of attacks merely ask for money for a decryption key. Venafi said it means that because ransomware and backups attack now rely on data exfiltration, effective backup strategies are therefore to an extent “no longer effective” for containing a breach. “Ransomware attacks have become much more dangerous. They have evolved beyond basic security defenses and business continuity techniques like next-gen antivirus and backups,” said Kevin Bocek, the vice-president of business development and threat intelligence at Venafi. Venafi also discovered that cybercriminals are progressively following through on their threats whether or not they get paid. Indeed, 18% of victims had their data leaked despite paying, while more than the 16% refused outright to pay anything and still had their data leaked. Some 8% refused outright but then had their customers extorted, and 35% paid but were left unable to retrieve their data. Attackers understand their victims have likely implemented recovery systems and backups, and recognize that these kinds of tactics are their best shot at a win. “Organisations are unprepared to defend against ransomware that exfiltrates data, so they pay the ransom, but this only motivates attackers to seek more. The bad news is that attackers are following through on extortion threats, even after the ransom has been paid. This means CISOs are under much more pressure because a successful attack is much more likely to create a full-scale service disruption that affects customers,” said Bocek. Respondents to Venafi’s survey agreed by some margin that double and triple extortion attacks were rapidly growing in popularity and this made it harder to say no to ransom demands, creating further problems for security teams. Respondents also tended to agree that ransomware attacks were evolving a little quicker for security tech to keep up. As a result, 76% are planning further spending on ransomware and backup-specific controls that go above and beyond air-gapped storage. Bocek said, “Threat actors are constantly evolving their attacks to make them more potent, and it’s time for the cyber security industry to respond in kind,”. “Ransomware often evades detection simply because it runs without a trusted machine identity. Using machine identity management to reduce the use of unsigned scripts, increase code signing, and restricting the execution of malicious macros are vital to well-rounded ransomware protection.”

Hackers have adopted a wider use of multi-factor authentication and the security researchers are warning of a new threat that’s only likely to become more serious as time goes on: Hackers who publish phishing kits have found a way to add multi-factor authentication bypassing capabilities to their software. A recent study from MFA company Duo found that, as of 2021, 78% of people have or do use MFA, compared to just 28% in 2017. That rapid increase surely ruffled some cybercriminal feathers in the past few years, but that hardly means they’re down for the count. If anything, enterprising hackers are motivated by a challenge like the one posed by MFA, and Proofpoint seems to have evidence that they’ve succeeded. It is said that “is already out there and happening. Consumers, as well as enterprise users, are already being targeted.” According to Aimei Wei, founder and CTO of Stellar Cyber. Evolution of phishing by proxy Since hackers have adopted a wider use of multi-factor authentication it has been reported that phishing kits available for sale online range from “simple open-source kits with human-readable code and no-frills functionality to sophisticated kits utilizing numerous layers of obfuscation and built-in modules that allow for stealing usernames, passwords, MFA tokens, social security numbers, and credit card numbers.” A way that they will typically do that is to recreate a target website, like a login page, in the hopes of tricking unaware users. With MFA in the mix, fake pages are rendered useless: While an attacker may have a username and password, the second factor remains out of reach. Enter what Proofpoint calls “a new kind of kit” that, instead of recreating a page, uses a transparent reverse proxy to act as a man-in-the-middle. By intercepting all the traffic between a victim and their destination server, these transparent proxy MitM attacks allow the user to carry on without ever knowing that their credentials, and their session cookie, have been stolen.

A couple of years ago Ethereum network experienced a hard fork, creating two separate blockchains: Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC). Sometimes confused with Ethereum, Ethereum Classic is now a totally different cryptocurrency with different technological and philosophical goals, specifically, a special focus on immutability popularly expressed as “code is law.” Ethereum Classic is also a decentralized computing system that can run a wide variety of applications. ETC is Ethereum Classic’s native currency, which is used to power transactions and smart contracts on its network. How Ethereum Classic works? Ethereum Classic users pay fees in ETC to execute smart contracts, which is kind of like a fuel that keeps the whole thing running. Gas fees pay miners which solve “proof of work” puzzles using sophisticated computers to help verify the network.  A key distinction, between ETH and ETC, is planning to migrate from “proof of work” mining to a new system called “proof of stake.” Ethereum Classic has no such plans and intends to keep traditional mining on its own blockchain after Ethereum migrates. Like ETH, new ETC is issued to the circulating supply as a reward for miners as new blocks of transactions are added to the blockchain. Unlike ETH, which doesn’t have a fixed supply, ETC has a maximum supply of 210,700,000 coins. How is ETC mined? Powerful computers mine ETC, adding it to the circulating supply. While ETC can be mined using widely-available graphics processors, it’s most likely not profitable unless you use an ASIC, which is a specialized device designed for crypto mining. After Ethereum Classic’s fork from Ethereum in 2016, ETC has struggled to compete in terms of market capitalization, developers, and network security as measured by total mining power. Over its history, ETC has been subject to numerous “51% attacks” in which malicious actors control a majority of the mining power and were thus able to spend coins they didn’t actually own. Check out our other article about Bitcoin predictions in 2022.